Archive for December, 2017

Absence of standards is the greatest concern.  Rick Simpson, who seems to have first announced the cannabis-cancer connection, advocated acclimating to massive doses of cannabis concentrates, but no one knows the appropriate amounts to prescribe.


While smoking cannabis may be how researchers tested, or noted, the efficacy, eating cannabis provides a more even, time-release, and may therefore be a better alternative to smoking, which spikes blood content of the cannabinoids quickly, followed by a faster decline.

It may also help Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s patients, too.



This is such an egregious example of poor quality “research”, clearly intended for political purposes.  I will give some examples:

The consensus of recent research shows that right-to-carry laws are linked with higher violent crime rates, according to a new Science paper co-authored by a Stanford professor.

Where is the causality?  Do right to carry laws cause violence, or do violent neighborhoods increase the need for carry laws?  What about police presence?  If police are spread thin due to budgetary issues or extremely violent jurisdictions, could this be the cause of more shootings?

…lifting restrictions on concealed carry guns increases violent crime and that laws restricting gun ownership for people convicted of domestic violence reduced killings of female domestic partners.

Where is the causality?  Do violent crime-ridden neighborhoods invite more concealed carry permits?  What about Females protecting themselves against violent males?  Guns don’t CAUSE violence; they are a symptom of violence.  A runny nose does not CAUSE a cold; it is the result of one.

The authors hope their work can help guide policy-makers who are debating measures to reduce gun violence.

Surprise?  THIS is the purpose of this “study”, hacked out by someone with an agenda in a few hours.

The level of gun violence in the United States places it as an outlier among developed countries. In 2015, over 36,000 people died from gunfire, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with roughly two-thirds of those deaths being classified as suicide. America’s gun-murder rate is 25 times that of the other high-income nations, and the gun-suicide rate is eight times as high.

BULLSHIT!  This is political BULLSHIT!  MOST of the gun crimes in the U.S. are by, and among drug gangs.  If you remove this sad fact, then the U.S. falls into a distant “me too”, far down the statistics ladder.  Moreover, these shootings are MOSTLY in Democrat-controlled cities.  Should one assume that being a Democrat is more likely to get shot?  This is a prime example of misuse of correlation to obscure causality.

As for suicides, a person deciding to end their life will rarely choose the most painful and slow method, like climbing into a tree grinder, feet first.  They will naturally choose the quickest, least painful method available– often a gun.  Many people jumped off the Golden Gate Bridge– do we assume that the bridge CAUSES suicide?  And so on.

“If a gun regulation is most likely to be enacted in jurisdictions that have recently experienced a surge in gun violence and if that surge is temporary, the result will be that implementation of the new measure is followed by a drop in crime, giving the false appearance that it was effective,” the researchers wrote.

If this were true, all we would need to do is to put up NO CRIME signs and be done with it.  This ridiculous assertion suggests that criminals heed laws, when by definition, they do not.  Such laws only disarm the law-abiding, making them even more vulnerable to criminals’ whims.

AuntieBS hopes that her readers engage in critical thinking and do not fall victim to the BULLSHIT that permeates our society for nefarious purposes.  I will not comment on the rest of this garbage paper.


Study: Alcohol Sales Fall Following Cannabis Legalization

Cannabis LegalizationStorrs, CT: Sales of alcoholic beverages decline following the enactment of medical marijuana access laws, according to a working paper authored by a team of researchers from the University of Connecticut and Georgia State University.

Authors evaluated the relationship between medical marijuana laws and retail alcohol sales in more than 2,000 US counties for the years 2006 to 2015. Alcohol sales trends in medical cannabis states were compared to sales trends in states where cannabis remained illegal. Researchers determined that counties located in medical cannabis jurisdictions, on average, experienced a reduction in monthly alcohol sales of 15 percent.

Researchers concluded: “We find that marijuana and alcohol are strong substitutes. … States legalizing medical marijuana use experience significant decreases in the aggregate sale of alcohol, beer and wine. Moreover, the effects are not short-lived, with significant reductions observed up to 24 months after the passage of the law.”

Consumer trend data from California reports that those with legal access to cannabis frequently reduce their alcohol intake. A 2016 analysis of beer sales in Colorado, Oregon, and Washington reported that retail sales “collectively underperformed” in the years following the enactment of adult use marijuana regulations.

For more information, contact Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director, at: Full text of the study, “Helping settle the marijuana and alcohol debate: Evidence from scanner data,” appears online.

Some people quit smoking cigarettes with alternatives like patches, lozenges, gum, while others are more successful cold-turkey.  So, whether or not cannabis helps may be highly subjective.


While the authors were careful not to say that cannabis is causal to bipolar issues, they implied it.  It could very well be that people who suffer from manic/depressive symptoms are more likely to reach for cannabis (and other drugs) to help ease their misery.