Archive for April, 2018

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180424160233.htm

I have long been an advocate of a direct test for coordination, judgment, and reaction time, instead of the current cannabis metabolite test being used in some areas to determine whether or not a driver is stoned.  The problem with this test is that cannabis metabolites can remain in a person’s blood for a month after usage has stopped, and is a very poor indicator of the driver’s state of mind.

Instead, a field-administered test of reaction time, judgment, and coordination could be a vastly better indicator of driver impairment and driving ability.  It can be administered with a laptop computer, as law-enforcement officers usually have in their cars, or by a custom device.  Not only would it detect impairment, irrespective of what intoxicant was used, but would also get aged or unhealthy drivers off the road.  It makes little difference whether a driver is impaired due to drug use or because of serious illnesses or age-related degeneration.

AuntieBS

Advertisements

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180423155046.htm

Research into which cannabinoids are effective will go a long way in treating cancer.  Maybe it’s time to rattle our representatives’ cages and insist that research into cannabis be allowed unimpeded.  The current scheduling is ridiculous, and the entire country knows that.

AuntieBS

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180423125052.htm

We take risks during our lives, but medicating our babies may not be the wisest thing to do.  Let them grow up normally, so they can decide for themselves when they are of age.

AuntieBS

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180419100110.htm

Another useful data point.

AuntieBS

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180416085927.htm

Puh-leeze.  “However, the AASM has concluded that sleep apnea should be excluded from the list of chronic medical conditions for state medical cannabis programs due to unreliable delivery methods and insufficient evidence of treatment effectiveness, tolerability and safety.”  What a crock-o-shit.  Unreliable delivery methods?  What is unreliable about eating a given amount of THC?  I know of many who have self-medicated for pain, sleep, etc, very reliably by ingesting cannabis chocolate containing 10-30 mg THC, about two hours before expecting the desired effect.  True, tolerance quickly builds and within a month or two of daily ingestion like that, the dosage can be quadruple the virgin dose, but a month of abstinence restores the initial sensitivity just fine.  How can researchers not know this?

Evidence of treatment can be determined almost immediately, through a respiration monitor, even if subjective.  Safety is well known and tolerability can also be subjectively determined, but starting with low doses until the patient is acclimated and not fearful.

The tone of this paper smacks of Big Pharma, trying to cast fear, uncertainty, and doubt about a plant product which doesn’t generate obscene revenue for the pharmaceutical corporation.  They would much rather sell you a much more dangerous, less-effective pill, than to admit that a plant is not only safe but can be even more effective.

AuntieBS

http://www.businessinsider.com/health-benefits-of-medical-marijuana-2014-4

It’s beginning to go mainstream, folks.  As soon as obstacles to studying it are removed, and Big Pharma gets out of the way, we may have an entire new generation of medications derived from cannabis.  Until then, we medicate ourselves, prudently, intelligently, and responsibly.

AuntieBS